The U.S.-Israel Alliance: A Strategic Partnership

The United States and Israel have a long-standing and deeply-rooted alliance that began shortly after Israel’s creation in the mid-20th century. This partnership is based on what both countries describe as shared strategic interests and values. For the U.S., Israel is a stable democratic partner in the politically volatile Middle East. The alliance involves close cooperation in military intelligence, technology, and regional security. This strategic bond is a key reason why the U.S. has historically provided significant support to Israel, viewing its security as vital to American interests in the region.

The Role of Lobbying and Influence

A significant factor in the U.S.-Israel relationship is the role of lobbying groups in the American political system. Pro-Israel organizations, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), are highly effective at advocating for their cause. These groups work to foster a positive relationship between the two countries by meeting with lawmakers, providing information, and making campaign contributions to political candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties.

This form of political advocacy is legal and common in the U.S. political system, where many different interest groups—from environmental organizations to large corporations—lobby the government to influence policy. However, critics argue that the influence of pro-Israel lobbying is so powerful that it makes it difficult for lawmakers to publicly criticize Israeli government policies without risking political backlash. This, they say, leads to a foreign policy that is not always aligned with U.S. interests or public opinion.

How U.S. Taxpayer Money Funds Israel

Each year, the United States provides Israel with a substantial amount of financial aid, which is funded by American taxpayers. The current agreement provides billions of dollars annually, the vast majority of which is designated for military assistance. This money is used for a variety of purposes, including purchasing American-made military equipment, developing missile defense systems like the Iron Dome, and maintaining a military advantage in the region.

Following the outbreak of the recent conflict in Gaza, the U.S. approved billions more in emergency military aid. This financial support is a source of major debate. Supporters argue that the aid is essential for the security of a key ally and helps maintain stability. Critics, however, argue that this funding makes the U.S. complicit in the destruction and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. They point to the fact that U.S.-made bombs and equipment are being used in military operations that have killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, a majority of them women and children.

The Debate Over Genocide and International Law

The scale of the death and destruction in Gaza has led to accusations of genocide against Israel by numerous human rights organizations, international legal scholars, and several countries. These groups argue that the relentless bombing, the blockade of food and medicine, and statements by some Israeli officials show an intent to destroy the Palestinian people in Gaza. South Africa has formally brought a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the UN’s top court, based on these accusations.

Israel and the United States strongly reject the charge of genocide. They argue that Israel’s military actions are a legitimate act of self-defence against Hamas, which they designate as a terrorist organization. They state that civilian deaths are an unavoidable tragedy of war and that Israel takes steps to minimize them, a claim that is heavily disputed by aid agencies on the ground. This disagreement over the term “genocide” is at the heart of the global debate, and the ongoing case at the ICJ has placed the actions of both Israel and its main backer, the U.S., under intense international scrutiny.